[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016092716.1a8d528f@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 09:27:16 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com,
davem@...emloft.net, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
brouer@...hat.com, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org,
matteo.croce@...hat.com, mw@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 8/8] net: mvneta: add XDP_TX support
On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:09:00 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > > +static int
> > > +mvneta_xdp_xmit_back(struct mvneta_port *pp, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > > +{
> > > + struct xdp_frame *xdpf = convert_to_xdp_frame(xdp);
> > > + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > > + struct mvneta_tx_queue *txq;
> > > + struct netdev_queue *nq;
> > > + u32 ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (unlikely(!xdpf))
> > > + return MVNETA_XDP_CONSUMED;
> >
> > Personally I'd prefer you haven't called a function which return code
> > has to be error checked in local variable init.
>
> do you mean moving cpu = smp_processor_id(); after the if condition?
[...]
struct xdp_frame *xdpf;
[...]
xdpf = convert_to_xdp_frame(xdp);
if (unlikely(!xdpf))
return MVNETA_XDP_CONSUMED;
I meant xdpf, sorry to be unclear.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists