netdev - Re: [PATCH net V4 1/2] net: phy: micrel: Discern KSZ8051 and KSZ8795 PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2d59ae1a-fe6e-8bf5-36a4-db8c2fa48617@denx.de>
Date:   Wed, 16 Oct 2019 20:06:25 +0200
From:   Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        george.mccollister@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        sean.nyekjaer@...vas.dk, Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com,
        woojung.huh@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V4 1/2] net: phy: micrel: Discern KSZ8051 and KSZ8795
 PHYs

On 10/16/19 7:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Marek Vasut
> Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:39:18 +0200
> 
>> Maybe next time we can do these exercises on patches which are not
>> bugfixes for real issues?
> 
> No, we should put changes into the tree which are correctly formed.
> 
> If you're not interested in learning how to submit changes properly,
> we am not interested in accepting your work.
> 
> It's as simple as that.

If I wasn't interested, I wouldn't have sent V5 before replying to the
previous email. I hope the V5 is fine.