[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191016032949.1445888-2-andriin@fb.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 20:29:44 -0700
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
To: <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <ast@...com>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>
CC: <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, <kernel-team@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/6] selftests/bpf: teach test_progs to cd into subdir
We are building a bunch of "flavors" of test_progs, e.g., w/ alu32 flag
for Clang when building BPF object. test_progs setup is relying on
having all the BPF object files and extra resources to be available in
current working directory, though. But we actually build all these files
into a separate sub-directory. Next set of patches establishes
convention of naming "flavored" test_progs (and test runner binaries in
general) as test_progs-flavor (e.g., test_progs-alu32), for each such
extra flavor. This patch teaches test_progs binary to automatically
detect its own extra flavor based on its argv[0], and if present, to
change current directory to a flavor-specific subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
index af75a1c7a458..c7e52f4194e2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ void *spin_lock_thread(void *arg)
}
/* extern declarations for test funcs */
-#define DEFINE_TEST(name) extern void test_##name();
+#define DEFINE_TEST(name) extern void test_##name(void);
#include <prog_tests/tests.h>
#undef DEFINE_TEST
@@ -518,6 +518,33 @@ static void stdio_restore(void)
#endif
}
+/*
+ * Determine if test_progs is running as a "flavored" test runner and switch
+ * into corresponding sub-directory to load correct BPF objects.
+ *
+ * This is done by looking at executable name. If it contains "-flavor"
+ * suffix, then we are running as a flavored test runner.
+ */
+int cd_flavor_subdir(const char *exec_name)
+{
+ /* General form of argv[0] passed here is:
+ * some/path/to/test_progs[-flavor], where -flavor part is optional.
+ * First cut out "test_progs[-flavor]" part, then extract "flavor"
+ * part, if it's there.
+ */
+ const char *flavor = strrchr(exec_name, '/');
+
+ if (!flavor)
+ return 0;
+ flavor++;
+ flavor = strrchr(flavor, '-');
+ if (!flavor)
+ return 0;
+ flavor++;
+ printf("Switching to flavor '%s' subdirectory...\n", flavor);
+ return chdir(flavor);
+}
+
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
static const struct argp argp = {
@@ -531,6 +558,10 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
if (err)
return err;
+ err = cd_flavor_subdir(argv[0]);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
libbpf_set_print(libbpf_print_fn);
srand(time(NULL));
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists