netdev - Re: taprio testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bluf182w.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:32:39 -0700
From:   Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To:     Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc:     "netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: taprio testing - Any help?

Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com> writes:
>
> root@...7xx-evm:~# tc qdisc replace dev eth0 parent root handle 100 taprio \
>  >     num_tc 4 \
>  >     map 2 3 1 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 \
>  >     queues 1@0 1@0 1@0 1@0 \
>  >     base-time 1564535762845777831 \
>  >     sched-entry S 0xC 15000000 \
>  >     sched-entry S 0x2 15000000 \
>  >     sched-entry S 0x4 15000000 \
>  >     sched-entry S 0x8 15000000 \
>  >     txtime-delay 300000 \
>  >     flags 0x1 \
>  >     clockid CLOCK_TAI
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>
> Anything wrong with the command syntax?

I tried this example here, and it got accepted ok. I am using the
current net-next master. The first thing that comes to mind is that
perhaps you backported some old version of some of the patches (so it's
different than what's upstream now).


Cheers,
--
Vinicius