netdev - RE: [PATCH] can: m_can: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:24:41 +0530
From:   "pankj.sharma" <pankj.sharma@...sung.com>
To:     "'Jeroen Hofstee'" <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>,
        "'Simon Horman'" <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
Cc:     "'kbuild test robot'" <lkp@...el.com>, <kbuild-all@...ts.01.org>,
        <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        <mkl@...gutronix.de>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <eugen.hristev@...rochip.com>, <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>, <rcsekar@...sung.com>,
        "'Sriram Dash'" <sriram.dash@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] can: m_can: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings

> From: Jeroen Hofstee <jhofstee@...tronenergy.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: m_can: fix boolreturn.cocci warnings
> 
> Hello Simon,
> 
> On 10/15/19 9:13 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 06:37:54AM +0000, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On 10/15/19 7:57 AM, Simon Horman wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 11:04:28PM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> >>>> From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c:783:9-10: WARNING: return of 0/1 in
> >>>> function 'is_protocol_err' with return type bool
> >>>>
> >>>>    Return statements in functions returning bool should use
> >>>>    true/false instead of 1/0.
> >>>> Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolreturn.cocci
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 46946163ac61 ("can: m_can: add support for handling
> >>>> arbitration error")
> >>>> CC: Pankaj Sharma <pankj.sharma@...sung.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>
> >>>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Pankaj-Sharma/can-
> m_can-add-support-for-handling-arbitration-error/20191014-193532
> >>>>
> >>>>    m_can.c |    4 ++--
> >>>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> --- a/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c
> >>>> @@ -780,9 +780,9 @@ static inline bool is_lec_err(u32 psr)
> >>>>    static inline bool is_protocol_err(u32 irqstatus)
> >>>>    {
> >>>>    	if (irqstatus & IR_ERR_LEC_31X)
> >>>> -		return 1;
> >>>> +		return true;
> >>>>    	else
> >>>> -		return 0;
> >>>> +		return false;
> >>>>    }
> >>>>
> >>>>    static int m_can_handle_protocol_error(struct net_device *dev,
> >>>> u32 irqstatus)
> >>>>
> >>> <2c>
> >>> Perhaps the following is a nicer way to express this (completely untested):
> >>>
> >>> 	return !!(irqstatus & IR_ERR_LEC_31X); </2c>
> >>
> >> Really...., !! for bool / _Bool types? why not simply:
> >>
> >> static inline bool is_protocol_err(u32 irqstatus)
> >> 	return irqstatus & IR_ERR_LEC_31X;

Thank you. Will Modify in v2.

> >> }
> > Good point, silly me.
> 
> 
> For clarity, I am commenting on the suggestion made by the tool, not the patch
> itself..
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jeroen