lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:28:28 -0700
From:   Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xdp: Handle device unregister for devmap_hash map type

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:31 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 9:07 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> It seems I forgot to add handling of devmap_hash type maps to the device
> >> unregister hook for devmaps. This omission causes devices to not be
> >> properly released, which causes hangs.
> >>
> >> Fix this by adding the missing handler.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 6f9d451ab1a3 ("xdp: Add devmap_hash map type for looking up devices by hashed index")
> >> Reported-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> >> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >>  kernel/bpf/devmap.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> >>
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> +
> >> +               while (dev) {
> >> +                       odev = (netdev == dev->dev) ? dev : NULL;
> >> +                       dev = hlist_entry_safe(rcu_dereference_raw(hlist_next_rcu(&dev->index_hlist)),
> >
> > Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl, this looks like a rather long line.
>
> That was a deliberate departure from the usual line length, actually. I
> don't think it helps readability to split that into three lines just to
> adhere to a strict line length requirement...

Wouldn't local variable make it even more readable?

>
> -Toke
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ