| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20191019001449.fk3gnhih4nx724pm@ast-mbp>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 17:14:51 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@...el.com>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
"Herbert, Tom" <tom.herbert@...el.com>
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] xsk: allow AF_XDP sockets to receive
packets directly from a queue
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:40:07AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>
> Perf report for "AF_XDP default rxdrop" with patched kernel - mitigations ON
> ==========================================================================
> Samples: 44K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 38532389541
> Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> 15.31% ksoftirqd/28 [i40e] [k] i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc
> 10.50% ksoftirqd/28 bpf_prog_80b55d8a76303785 [k] bpf_prog_80b55d8a76303785
> 9.48% xdpsock [i40e] [k] i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc
> 8.62% xdpsock xdpsock [.] main
> 7.11% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_rcv
> 5.81% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xdp_do_redirect
> 4.46% xdpsock bpf_prog_80b55d8a76303785 [k] bpf_prog_80b55d8a76303785
> 3.83% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_rcv
why everything is duplicated?
Same code runs in different tasks ?
> 2.81% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] bpf_xdp_redirect_map
> 2.78% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_map_lookup_elem
> 2.44% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xdp_do_redirect
> 2.19% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __xsk_map_redirect
> 1.62% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_umem_peek_addr
> 1.57% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_umem_peek_addr
> 1.32% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu
> 1.28% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] bpf_xdp_redirect_map
> 1.15% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_device
> 1.12% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_map_lookup_elem
> 1.06% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __xsk_map_redirect
> 0.94% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_device
> 0.75% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] __x86_indirect_thunk_rax
> 0.66% ksoftirqd/28 [i40e] [k] i40e_clean_programming_status
> 0.64% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] net_rx_action
> 0.64% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] intel_idle
> 0.62% ksoftirqd/28 [i40e] [k] i40e_napi_poll
> 0.57% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu
>
> Perf report for "AF_XDP direct rxdrop" with patched kernel - mitigations ON
> ==========================================================================
> Samples: 46K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 38387018585
> Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> 21.94% ksoftirqd/28 [i40e] [k] i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc
> 14.36% xdpsock xdpsock [.] main
> 11.53% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_rcv
> 11.32% xdpsock [i40e] [k] i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc
> 4.02% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_rcv
> 2.91% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xdp_do_redirect
> 2.45% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_umem_peek_addr
> 2.19% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_umem_peek_addr
> 2.08% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] bpf_direct_xsk
> 2.07% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu
> 1.53% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_device
> 1.39% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_device
> 1.22% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xdp_get_xsk_from_qid
> 1.12% ksoftirqd/28 [i40e] [k] i40e_clean_programming_status
> 0.96% ksoftirqd/28 [i40e] [k] i40e_napi_poll
> 0.95% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] net_rx_action
> 0.89% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xdp_do_redirect
> 0.83% swapper [i40e] [k] i40e_clean_rx_irq_zc
> 0.70% swapper [kernel.vmlinux] [k] intel_idle
> 0.66% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] dma_direct_sync_single_for_cpu
> 0.60% xdpsock [kernel.vmlinux] [k] bpf_direct_xsk
> 0.50% ksoftirqd/28 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] xsk_umem_discard_addr
>
> Based on the perf reports comparing AF_XDP default and direct rxdrop, we can say that
> AF_XDP direct rxdrop codepath is avoiding the overhead of going through these functions
> bpf_prog_xxx
> bpf_xdp_redirect_map
> xsk_map_lookup_elem
> __xsk_map_redirect
> With AF_XDP direct, xsk_rcv() is directly called via bpf_direct_xsk() in xdp_do_redirect()
I don't think you're identifying the overhead correctly.
xsk_map_lookup_elem is 1%
but bpf_xdp_redirect_map() suppose to call __xsk_map_lookup_elem()
which is a different function:
ffffffff81493fe0 T __xsk_map_lookup_elem
ffffffff81492e80 t xsk_map_lookup_elem
10% for bpf_prog_80b55d8a76303785 is huge.
It's the actual code of the program _without_ any helpers.
How does the program actually look?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists