lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALDO+SZib59P3qmQNWGNjKnrn_+DsFnu+QoPE0gfqRLVRpDk+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:14:06 -0700
From:   William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
To:     xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com
Cc:     Greg Rose <gvrose8192@...il.com>, pravin shelar <pshelar@....org>,
        "<dev@...nvswitch.org>" <dev@...nvswitch.org>,
        Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] optimize openvswitch flow
 looking up

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 5:50 AM <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@...il.com>
>
> This series patch optimize openvswitch for performance or simplify
> codes.
>
> Patch 1, 2, 4: Port Pravin B Shelar patches to
> linux upstream with little changes.

btw, should we keep Pravin as the author of the above three patches?

Regards,
William

>
> Patch 5, 6, 7: Optimize the flow looking up and
> simplify the flow hash.
>
> Patch 8, 9: are bugfix.
>
> The performance test is on Intel Xeon E5-2630 v4.
> The test topology is show as below:
>
> +-----------------------------------+
> |   +---------------------------+   |
> |   | eth0   ovs-switch    eth1 |   | Host0
> |   +---------------------------+   |
> +-----------------------------------+
>       ^                       |
>       |                       |
>       |                       |
>       |                       |
>       |                       v
> +-----+----+             +----+-----+
> | netperf  | Host1       | netserver| Host2
> +----------+             +----------+
>
> We use netperf send the 64B packets, and insert 255+ flow-mask:
> $ ovs-dpctl add-flow ovs-switch "in_port(1),eth(dst=00:01:00:00:00:00/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:01),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no)" 2
> ...
> $ ovs-dpctl add-flow ovs-switch "in_port(1),eth(dst=00:ff:00:00:00:00/ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff),eth_type(0x0800),ipv4(frag=no)" 2
> $
> $ netperf -t UDP_STREAM -H 2.2.2.200 -l 40 -- -m 18
>
> * Without series patch, throughput 8.28Mbps
> * With series patch, throughput 46.05Mbps
>
> v3->v4:
> access ma->count with READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE API. More information,
> see patch 5 comments.
>
> v2->v3:
> update ma point when realloc mask_array in patch 5.
>
> v1->v2:
> use kfree_rcu instead of call_rcu
>
> Tonghao Zhang (10):
>   net: openvswitch: add flow-mask cache for performance
>   net: openvswitch: convert mask list in mask array
>   net: openvswitch: shrink the mask array if necessary
>   net: openvswitch: optimize flow mask cache hash collision
>   net: openvswitch: optimize flow-mask looking up
>   net: openvswitch: simplify the flow_hash
>   net: openvswitch: add likely in flow_lookup
>   net: openvswitch: fix possible memleak on destroy flow-table
>   net: openvswitch: don't unlock mutex when changing the user_features
>     fails
>   net: openvswitch: simplify the ovs_dp_cmd_new
>
>  net/openvswitch/datapath.c   |  65 +++++----
>  net/openvswitch/flow.h       |   1 -
>  net/openvswitch/flow_table.c | 316 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  net/openvswitch/flow_table.h |  19 ++-
>  4 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@...nvswitch.org
> https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ