netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 05/16] net: dsa: use ports list to setup switches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21738767-7e98-6c4c-ba1c-bea29142d481@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 20 Oct 2019 19:42:15 -0700
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 05/16] net: dsa: use ports list to setup switches



On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Use the new ports list instead of iterating over switches and their
> ports when setting up the switches and their ports.
> 
> At the same time, provide setup states and messages for ports and
> switches as it is done for the trees.

Humm, that becomes quite noisy, would it make sense to have those
messages only for non-user ports that are not already visible because
they do not have a net_device?

If you have multiple switches in a fabric, it might be convenient to use
dev_info(dp->ds->dev, ...) to print your message so you can clearly
identify which port belongs to which switch, which becomes even more
important as it is all flattened thanks to lists now. What do you think?
-- 
Florian