netdev - [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix registration of Rx-only sockets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1571645818-16244-1-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:16:58 +0200
From:   Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
To:     magnus.karlsson@...el.com, bjorn.topel@...el.com, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        jonathan.lemon@...il.com, kal.conley@...tris.com
Cc:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix registration of Rx-only sockets

Having Rx-only AF_XDP sockets can potentially lead to a crash in the
system by a NULL pointer dereference in xsk_umem_consume_tx(). This
function iterates through a list of all sockets tied to a umem and
checks if there are any packets to send on the Tx ring. Rx-only
sockets do not have a Tx ring, so this will cause a NULL pointer
dereference. This will happen if you have registered one or more
Rx-only sockets to a umem and the driver is checking the Tx ring even
on Rx, or if the XDP_SHARED_UMEM mode is used and there is a mix of
Rx-only and other sockets tied to the same umem.

Fixed by only putting sockets with a Tx component on the list that
xsk_umem_consume_tx() iterates over.

Fixes: ac98d8aab61b ("xsk: wire upp Tx zero-copy functions")
Reported-by: Kal Cutter Conley <kal.conley@...tris.com>
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
---
 net/xdp/xdp_umem.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
index 16d5f35..3049af2 100644
--- a/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
+++ b/net/xdp/xdp_umem.c
@@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ void xdp_add_sk_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_sock *xs)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;

+	if (!xs->tx)
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&umem->xsk_list_lock, flags);
 	list_add_rcu(&xs->list, &umem->xsk_list);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&umem->xsk_list_lock, flags);
@@ -36,6 +39,9 @@ void xdp_del_sk_umem(struct xdp_umem *umem, struct xdp_sock *xs)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;

+	if (!xs->tx)
+		return;
+
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&umem->xsk_list_lock, flags);
 	list_del_rcu(&xs->list);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&umem->xsk_list_lock, flags);
-- 
2.7.4