lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c2ba06f1-fabd-1edb-b75f-8f6e2c23c0ce@codethink.co.uk>
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 16:23:00 +0100
From:   Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
To:     linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: hwbm: if CONFIG_NET_HWBM unset, make stub functions
 static

On 22/10/2019 16:18, Ben Dooks (Codethink) wrote:
> If CONFIG_NET_HWBM is not set, then these stub functions in
> <net/hwbm.h> should be declared static to avoid trying to
> export them from any driver that includes this.
> 
> Note, add __maybe_unused as the marvell mvneta.c driver will
> otherwise cause gcc warnings from these.

urgh, static inline was what I was actually searching for here.

> Fixes the following sparse warnings:
> 
> ./include/net/hwbm.h:24:6: warning: symbol 'hwbm_buf_free' was not declared. Should it be static?
> ./include/net/hwbm.h:25:5: warning: symbol 'hwbm_pool_refill' was not declared. Should it be static?
> ./include/net/hwbm.h:26:5: warning: symbol 'hwbm_pool_add' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks (Codethink) <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
> ---
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>   include/net/hwbm.h | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/hwbm.h b/include/net/hwbm.h
> index 81643cf8a1c4..cb5e6de8b7cd 100644
> --- a/include/net/hwbm.h
> +++ b/include/net/hwbm.h
> @@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ void hwbm_buf_free(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, void *buf);
>   int hwbm_pool_refill(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, gfp_t gfp);
>   int hwbm_pool_add(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, unsigned int buf_num);
>   #else
> -void hwbm_buf_free(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, void *buf) {}
> -int hwbm_pool_refill(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, gfp_t gfp) { return 0; }
> -int hwbm_pool_add(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, unsigned int buf_num)
> +static void __maybe_unused hwbm_buf_free(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, void *buf) {}
> +static int __maybe_unused hwbm_pool_refill(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, gfp_t gfp) { return 0; }
> +static int __maybe_unused hwbm_pool_add(struct hwbm_pool *bm_pool, unsigned int buf_num)
>   { return 0; }
>   #endif /* CONFIG_HWBM */
>   #endif /* _HWBM_H */
> 


-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius

https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ