lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 17:26:04 +0100
From:   Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>
To:     Charles McLachlan <cmclachlan@...arflare.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
        <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] sfc: perform XDP processing on received
 packets.

On 22/10/2019 16:38, Charles McLachlan wrote:
> Adds a field to hold an attached xdp_prog, but never populates it (see
> following patch).  Also, XDP_TX support is deferred to a later patch
> in the series.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles McLachlan <cmclachlan@...arflare.com>
> ---
<snip>
> @@ -764,6 +872,16 @@ void efx_init_rx_queue(struct efx_rx_queue *rx_queue)
>  	rx_queue->fast_fill_trigger = trigger;
>  	rx_queue->refill_enabled = true;
>  
> +	/* Initialise XDP queue information */
> +	rc = xdp_rxq_info_reg(&rx_queue->xdp_rxq_info, efx->net_dev,
> +			      rx_queue->core_index);
> +
> +	if (rc) {
> +		netif_err(efx, rx_err, efx->net_dev,
> +			  "Failure to initialise XDP queue information rc=%d\n",
> +			  rc);
> +	}
What happens if we try to use XDP after this has failed?
Should we set some kind of "XDP broken" flag to prevent that?

-Ed

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ