netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: fix sk_page_frag() recursion from memory reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191022101936.23759c14@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:19:36 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: fix sk_page_frag() recursion from memory reclaim

On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:25:57 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On 10/19/19 2:18 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> 
> > Whatever works is fine by me.  gfpflags_allow_blocking() is clearer
> > than testing __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM directly tho.  Maybe a better way is
> > introducing a new gfpflags_ helper?  
> 
> Sounds good to me !

IIUC there will be a v2 with a new helper, dropping this from patchwork.