lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3c79d203-33e9-11dc-939d-3cecd707eb40@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Oct 2019 20:47:17 -0600
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, allison@...utok.net,
        mmanning@...tta.att-mail.com, petrm@...lanox.com,
        dcaratti@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net: vlan: reverse 4 bytes of vlan header when
 setting initial MTU

On 10/21/19 7:31 PM, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> Or we just leave it as it is, and expect user to manually configure the MTU
> of vlan netdev to the MTU of thelower device minus vlan header when the
> performace in the above case is a concern to user?
> 

for now, I would think so. vlan on a vxlan device ... you are going
after q-in-q'ish with vxlan? that can not be a common deployment.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ