netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB5567B7B647E4FE60ECD88EDDEC680@VI1PR04MB5567.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Oct 2019 06:43:24 +0000
From:   Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>,
        Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2019 7:26 AM
> To: Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Roy Pledge
> <roy.pledge@....com>; Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes
> 
> On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:27:51 +0000, Madalin-cristian Bucur wrote:
> > Here's a series of changes for the DPAA Ethernet, addressing minor
> > or unapparent issues in the codebase, adding probe ordering based on
> > a recently added DPAA QMan API, removing some redundant code.
> 
> Hi Madalin!
> 
> Patch 2 looks like it may be a bug fix but I gather it has a dependency
> in net-next so it can't go to net?

It's a fix for a theoretical issue that is not reproducing with the current
code base. Future changes related to the IOMMU support may make this issue
visible.

> More importantly - I think your From: line on this posting is
> 
> Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
> 
> While the sign-off on the patches you wrote is:
> 
> Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
> 
> I think these gotta be identical otherwise the bots which ensure the
> author added his sign-off may scream at us.

The formatted patches look like this:

>From 55a524a41099fa9b2f5fbbb9f3a87108437942bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 15:21:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-to: madalin.bucur@....com

but then there are some MS servers trying to be helpful and the message
ends up like this:

From: Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
To: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@....com>, Laurentiu Tudor
	<laurentiu.tudor@....com>, Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes
Thread-Topic: [PATCH net-next 0/6] DPAA Ethernet changes
Thread-Index: AQHViAr0ehww7MPYPUqedXDa00qudg==
X-MS-Exchange-MessageSentRepresentingType: 1
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 12:27:51 +0000
Message-ID: <1571660862-18313-1-git-send-email-madalin.bucur@....com>
Reply-To: Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bucur@....com>
<snip>
Return-Path: madalin.bucur@....com

It's probably a good time to think about pull requests...