[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ3xEMgXujHYyMrMdmDDEyWJ6SLw8uKrxHZw=aTRkn-RQUjfKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:20:55 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org" <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] page_pool: API for numa node change handling
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 8:04 AM Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com> wrote:
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v4 @ 1.70GHz
> NIC: Mellanox Technologies MT27700 Family [ConnectX-4] (100G)
>
> XDP Drop/TX single core:
> NUMA | XDP | Before | After
> ---------------------------------------
> Close | Drop | 11 Mpps | 10.9 Mpps
> Far | Drop | 4.4 Mpps | 5.8 Mpps
>
> Close | TX | 6.5 Mpps | 6.5 Mpps
> Far | TX | 4 Mpps | 3.5 Mpps
>
> Improvement is about 30% drop packet rate, 15% tx packet rate for numa far test.
some typo here, the TX far test results become worse, would be good to
clarify/fix the cover letter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists