netdev - Re: [PATCH wireless-drivers 2/2] mt76: dma: fix buffer unmap with non-linear skbs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191024081816.GA2440@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:18:16 +0200
From:   Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
To:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Cc:     kvalo@...eaurora.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, nbd@....name,
        lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-drivers 2/2] mt76: dma: fix buffer unmap with
 non-linear skbs

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:23:16AM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> mt76 dma layer is supposed to unmap skb data buffers while keep txwi
> mapped on hw dma ring. At the moment mt76 wrongly unmap txwi or does
> not unmap data fragments in even positions for non-linear skbs. This
> issue may result in hw hangs with A-MSDU if the system relies on IOMMU
> or SWIOTLB. Fix this behaviour properly unmapping data fragments on
> non-linear skbs.

If we have to keep txwi mapped, before unmap fragments, when then
txwi is unmaped ?

Stanislaw

> Fixes: 17f1de56df05 ("mt76: add common code shared between multiple chipsets")
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c | 10 +++++++---
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> index c747eb24581c..8c27956875e7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/dma.c
> @@ -93,11 +93,14 @@ static void
>  mt76_dma_tx_cleanup_idx(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q, int idx,
>  			struct mt76_queue_entry *prev_e)
>  {
> -	struct mt76_queue_entry *e = &q->entry[idx];
>  	__le32 __ctrl = READ_ONCE(q->desc[idx].ctrl);
> +	struct mt76_queue_entry *e = &q->entry[idx];
>  	u32 ctrl = le32_to_cpu(__ctrl);
> +	bool mcu = e->skb && !e->txwi;
> +	bool first = e->skb == DMA_DUMMY_DATA || e->txwi == DMA_DUMMY_DATA ||
> +		     (e->skb && !skb_is_nonlinear(e->skb));
>  
> -	if (!e->txwi || !e->skb) {
> +	if (!first || mcu) {
>  		__le32 addr = READ_ONCE(q->desc[idx].buf0);
>  		u32 len = FIELD_GET(MT_DMA_CTL_SD_LEN0, ctrl);
>  
> @@ -105,7 +108,8 @@ mt76_dma_tx_cleanup_idx(struct mt76_dev *dev, struct mt76_queue *q, int idx,
>  				 DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!(ctrl & MT_DMA_CTL_LAST_SEC0)) {
> +	if (!(ctrl & MT_DMA_CTL_LAST_SEC0) ||
> +	    e->txwi == DMA_DUMMY_DATA) {
>  		__le32 addr = READ_ONCE(q->desc[idx].buf1);
>  		u32 len = FIELD_GET(MT_DMA_CTL_SD_LEN1, ctrl);
>  
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>