netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Control action percpu counters allocation by netlink flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:17:40 -0400
From:   Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:     Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "mleitner@...hat.com" <mleitner@...hat.com>,
        "dcaratti@...hat.com" <dcaratti@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] Control action percpu counters allocation
 by netlink flag

On 2019-10-25 12:53 p.m., Vlad Buslov wrote:
[..]

Sorry, the distractions here are not helping.
When i responded i had started to do below

enum {
         TCA_ACT_UNSPEC,
         TCA_ACT_KIND,
         TCA_ACT_OPTIONS,
         TCA_ACT_INDEX,
         TCA_ACT_STATS,
         TCA_ACT_PAD,
         TCA_ACT_COOKIE,
         TCA_ACT_ROOT_FLAGS,
         __TCA_ACT_MAX
};

Note: "TCA_ACT_ROOT_FLAGS"
I think your other email may have tried to do the same?
So i claimed it was there in that email because grep showed it
but that's because i had added it;->

> For cls API lets take flower as an example: fl_change() parses TCA_FLOWER, and calls
> fl_set_parms()->tcf_exts_validate()->tcf_action_init() with
> TCA_FLOWER_ACT nested attribute. No TCA_ROOT is expected, TCA_FLOWER_ACT
> contains up to TCA_ACT_MAX_PRIO nested TCA_ACT attributes. So where can
> I include it without breaking backward compatibility?
> 
Not a clean solution but avoids the per action TLV attribute:

in user space parse_action() you add TCA_ACT_ROOT_FLAGS
if the user specifies this on the command line.

in the kernel everything just passes NULL for root_flags
when invocation is from tcf_exts_validate() i.e both
tcf_action_init_1() and
tcf_action_init()

In tcf_action_init_1(), if root_flags is NULL
you try to get flags from from tb[TCA_ACT_ROOT_FLAGS]

Apologies in advance for any latency - I will have time tomorrow.

cheers,
jamal