lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875zkcxy0x.fsf@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:26:06 -0700
From:   Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/sched/sch_generic.c:448

Hi,

Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> writes:

> I am able to trigger this a few seconds into running pi_stress (from
> rt-tests, quite a non network workload). But this is not the only one.
> I'm going through some logs to see what other test is triggering it.

Looking at the at the caveats section of pi_stress(8), this is expected:

"The pi_stress test threads run as SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR threads, which
means that they can starve critical system threads. It is advisable to
change the scheduling policy of critical system threads to be SCHED_FIFO
prior to running pi_stress and use a priority of 10 or higher, to
prevent those threads from being starved by the stress test."

Are the other workloads similar to pi_stress?


Cheers,
--
Vinicius


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ