[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <16c059aa-04a9-1301-fa72-eb475f3f3c6f@embeddedor.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 07:00:00 -0500
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Igor Russkikh <irusskikh@...vell.com>,
Igor Russkikh <Igor.Russkikh@...antia.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dmitry Bezrukov <Dmitry.Bezrukov@...antia.com>,
Nikita Danilov <Nikita.Danilov@...antia.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [EXT] [PATCH net-next] net: aquantia: fix error handling in
aq_nic_init
On 10/28/19 05:53, Igor Russkikh wrote:
>
>> Fix currenty ignored returned error by properly error checking
>> aq_phy_init().
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1487376 ("Unused value")
>> Fixes: dbcd6806af42 ("net: aquantia: add support for Phy access")
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
>> index 433adc099e44..1914aa0a19d0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/aquantia/atlantic/aq_nic.c
>> @@ -341,7 +341,8 @@ int aq_nic_init(struct aq_nic_s *self)
>>
>> if (self->aq_nic_cfg.aq_hw_caps->media_type == AQ_HW_MEDIA_TYPE_TP) {
>> self->aq_hw->phy_id = HW_ATL_PHY_ID_MAX;
>> - err = aq_phy_init(self->aq_hw);
>> + if (!aq_phy_init(self->aq_hw))
>> + goto err_exit;
>> }
>>
>> for (i = 0U, aq_vec = self->aq_vec[0];
>>
>
> Hi Gustavo,
>
Hi!
> I'd say the intention here was to ignore the error, as driver may still live if
> something unexpected happened on Phy access path.
>
I see. Please, see my comments below...
> Notice in the above fix you leave `err` as zero but do error path return -
> that'll break the datapath.
>
You're right. I totally missed that.
> I'd prefer to fix this with simple
>
> (void)aq_phy_init(self->aq_hw);
>
Yep. This is much better. Otherwise, both static analyzers and developers
get confused. :p
Something even better is to add both a cast and a comment explaining why
the return value is not being checked in this case (as you do above).
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists