netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests: Add tests for automatic map pinning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191028140624.584bcc1e@carbon>
Date:   Mon, 28 Oct 2019 14:06:24 +0100
From:   Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/4] selftests: Add tests for automatic map
 pinning

On Sun, 27 Oct 2019 21:53:19 +0100
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..ff2d7447777e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_pinning.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include "bpf_helpers.h"
> +
> +int _version SEC("version") = 1;
> +
> +struct {
> +	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
> +	__uint(max_entries, 1);
> +	__type(key, __u32);
> +	__type(value, __u64);
> +	__uint(pinning, LIBBPF_PIN_BY_NAME);
> +} pinmap SEC(".maps");

So, this is the new BTF-defined maps syntax.

Please remind me, what version of LLVM do we need to compile this?

Or was there a dependency on pahole?


> +struct {
> +	__uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
> +	__uint(max_entries, 1);
> +	__type(key, __u32);
> +	__type(value, __u64);
> +} nopinmap SEC(".maps");
> +
> +SEC("xdp_prog")
> +int _xdp_prog(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> +{
> +	return XDP_PASS;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> 



-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer