[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191030150642.5f008878@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 15:06:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciejromanfijalkowski@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
Krzysztof Kazimierczak <krzysztof.kazimierczak@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 5/9] ice: Add support for AF_XDP
On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 23:04:06 +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Oct 2019 11:50:09 -0700
> Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 20:29:06 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * ice_run_xdp_zc - Executes an XDP program in zero-copy path
> > > + * @rx_ring: Rx ring
> > > + * @xdp: xdp_buff used as input to the XDP program
> > > + *
> > > + * Returns any of ICE_XDP_{PASS, CONSUMED, TX, REDIR}
> > > + */
> > > +static int
> > > +ice_run_xdp_zc(struct ice_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> > > +{
> > > + int err, result = ICE_XDP_PASS;
> > > + struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> > > + struct ice_ring *xdp_ring;
> > > + u32 act;
> > > +
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > + xdp_prog = READ_ONCE(rx_ring->xdp_prog);
> > > + if (!xdp_prog) {
> > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > > + return ICE_XDP_PASS;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, xdp);
> > > + xdp->handle += xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start;
> > > + switch (act) {
> > > + case XDP_PASS:
> > > + break;
> > > + case XDP_TX:
> > > + xdp_ring = rx_ring->vsi->xdp_rings[rx_ring->q_index];
> > > + result = ice_xmit_xdp_buff(xdp, xdp_ring);
> > > + break;
> >
> > From the quick look at the code it wasn't clear to me how you deal with
> > XDP_TX on ZC frames. Could you describe the flow of such frames a
> > little bit?
>
> Sure, here we go.
> The ice_xmit_xdp_buff() is calling a convert_to_xdp_frame(xdp) which in that
> case falls to the xdp_convert_zc_to_xdp_frame(xdp), because xdp->rxq->mem.type
> is set to MEM_TYPE_ZERO_COPY.
>
> Now we are in the xdp_convert_zc_to_xdp_frame(xdp), where we allocate the
> extra page dedicated for struct xdp_frame, copy into this page the data that are
> within the current struct xdp_buff and everything is finished with a
> xdp_return_buff(xdp) call. Again, the mem->type is the MEM_TYPE_ZERO_COPY so
> the callback for freeing ZC frames is invoked, via:
>
> xa->zc_alloc->free(xa->zc_alloc, handle);
>
> And this guy was set during the Rx context initialization:
>
> ring->zca.free = ice_zca_free;
> err = xdp_rxq_info_reg_mem_model(&ring->xdp_rxq,
> MEM_TYPE_ZERO_COPY,
> &ring->zca);
>
> Finally, the ice_zca_free will put the ZC frame back to HW Rx ring. At this
> point, the ZC frame was recycled and the content from that frame sit in the
> standalone page, represented by struct xdp_frame, so we are free to proceed
> with transmission and that extra page will be freed during the cleanup of Tx
> irq, after it got transmitted successfully.
>
> I might over-complicate this description with too much code examples, so let me
> know if that makes sense to you.
Makes sense, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists