netdev - [PATCH net-next 14/16] mlxsw: spectrum: Fix base port get for split count 4 and 8

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:42:19 +0200
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 14/16] mlxsw: spectrum: Fix base port get for split count 4 and 8

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

The current code considers only split by 2 or 4. Make the base port
getting generic and allow split by 8 to be handled correctly. Generalize
the used port checks as well.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Shalom Toledo <shalomt@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c    | 28 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
index db05118adc44..0a5a4a252248 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
@@ -4233,19 +4233,21 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_split(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core, u8 local_port,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-	/* Make sure we have enough slave (even) ports for the split. */
-	if (count == 2) {
-		base_port = local_port;
-		if (mlxsw_sp->ports[base_port + offset]) {
-			netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Invalid split configuration\n");
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid split configuration");
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-	} else {
-		base_port = mlxsw_sp_cluster_base_port_get(local_port,
-							   max_width);
-		if (mlxsw_sp->ports[base_port + 1] ||
-		    mlxsw_sp->ports[base_port + 3]) {
+	/* Only in case max split is being done, the local port and
+	 * base port may differ.
+	 */
+	base_port = count == max_width ?
+		    mlxsw_sp_cluster_base_port_get(local_port, max_width) :
+		    local_port;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < count * offset; i++) {
+		/* Expect base port to exist and also the one in the middle in
+		 * case of maximal split count.
+		 */
+		if (i == 0 || (count == max_width && i == count / 2))
+			continue;
+
+		if (mlxsw_sp_port_created(mlxsw_sp, base_port + i)) {
 			netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Invalid split configuration\n");
 			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid split configuration");
 			return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.21.0