[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20191031124221.34028-7-jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 13:42:19 +0100
From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Stefan Raspl <raspl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 6/8] s390/qeth: don't set card state in qeth_qdio_clear_card()
Any change to the card state should only be driven by
qeth_l?_set_online() and qeth_l?_stop_card().
qeth_qdio_clear_card() currently also gets called from
(a) qeth_core_shutdown(), where we haven't walked through the whole
teardown sequence. So changing the state to DOWN is not accurate.
(b) qeth_core_hardsetup_card(), which is only called while the card is
still in DOWN state. No change in behaviour here.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@...ux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index d51dcb3c5a01..9e8bd8e08146 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -1513,7 +1513,6 @@ int qeth_qdio_clear_card(struct qeth_card *card, int use_halt)
rc = qeth_clear_halt_card(card, use_halt);
if (rc)
QETH_CARD_TEXT_(card, 3, "2err%d", rc);
- card->state = CARD_STATE_DOWN;
return rc;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(qeth_qdio_clear_card);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists