netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] net: phy: at803x: fix Kconfig description

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 01:05:50 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] net: phy: at803x: fix Kconfig description

Am 31. Oktober 2019 00:32:15 MEZ schrieb Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>:
>On 10/30/19 4:18 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 04:16:01PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 10/30/19 3:42 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
>>>> The name of the PHY is actually AR803x not AT803x. Additionally,
>add the
>>>> name of the vendor and mention the AR8031 support.
>>>
>>> Should not the vendor be QCA these days, or Qualcomm Atheros?
>> 
>> Atheros Qualcomm would work best in terms of not upsetting the sort
>> order.
>
>Yes except the company is actually named Qualcomm Atheros:
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualcomm_Atheros

Correct.. my bad. also the atheros prefix is wrong then.. because there is already a qca prefix.

but.. should i also reorder the entry in the Kconfig then? 

-michael