[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e21b79c1adf5c3c4fb94c11fbe30371c4e96943.camel@perches.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:37:01 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/7] net: bridge: convert fdbs to use bitops
On Tue, 2019-10-29 at 13:45 +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> Hi,
> We'd like to have a well-defined behaviour when changing fdb flags. The
> problem is that we've added new fields which are changed from all
> contexts without any locking. We are aware of the bit test/change races
> and these are fine (we can remove them later), but it is considered
> undefined behaviour to change bitfields from multiple threads and also
> on some architectures that can result in unexpected results,
> specifically when all fields between the changed ones are also
> bitfields. The conversion to bitops shows the intent clearly and
> makes them use functions with well-defined behaviour in such cases.
> There is no overhead for the fast-path, the bit changing functions are
> used only in special cases when learning and in the slow path.
> In addition this conversion allows us to simplify fdb flag handling and
> avoid bugs for future bits (e.g. a forgetting to clear the new bit when
> allocating a new fdb). All bridge selftests passed, also tried all of the
> converted bits manually in a VM.
>
> Thanks,
> Nik
>
> Nikolay Aleksandrov (7):
> net: bridge: fdb: convert is_local to bitops
> net: bridge: fdb: convert is_static to bitops
> net: bridge: fdb: convert is_sticky to bitops
> net: bridge: fdb: convert added_by_user to bitops
> net: bridge: fdb: convert added_by_external_learn to use bitops
> net: bridge: fdb: convert offloaded to use bitops
> net: bridge: fdb: set flags directly in fdb_create
Wouldn't it be simpler to change all these bitfields to bool?
The next member is ____cachline_aligned_in_smp so it's not
like the struct size matters or likely even changes.
---
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_private.h b/net/bridge/br_private.h
index ce2ab1..46d2f10 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_private.h
+++ b/net/bridge/br_private.h
@@ -183,12 +183,12 @@ struct net_bridge_fdb_entry {
struct net_bridge_fdb_key key;
struct hlist_node fdb_node;
- unsigned char is_local:1,
- is_static:1,
- is_sticky:1,
- added_by_user:1,
- added_by_external_learn:1,
- offloaded:1;
+ bool is_local;
+ bool is_static;
+ bool is_sticky;
+ bool added_by_user;
+ bool added_by_external_learn;
+ bool offloaded;
/* write-heavy members should not affect lookups */
unsigned long updated ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists