netdev - [PATCH net-next 05/16] mlxsw: spectrum: Distinguish between unsplittable and split port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:42:10 +0200
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, jiri@...lanox.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 05/16] mlxsw: spectrum: Distinguish between unsplittable and split port

From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>

Currently when user does split, he is not able to distinguish if the
port cannot be split because it is already split, or because it cannot
be split at all. Add another check for split flag to distinguish this.
Also add check forbidding split when maximal width is 1.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Shalom Toledo <shalomt@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c | 15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
index e0111e0a1a35..3644fca096ac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum.c
@@ -4118,6 +4118,13 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_split(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core, u8 local_port,
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
+	/* Split ports cannot be split. */
+	if (mlxsw_sp_port->split) {
+		netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Port cannot be split further\n");
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port cannot be split further");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
 	module = mlxsw_sp_port->mapping.module;
 
 	max_width = mlxsw_core_module_max_width(mlxsw_core,
@@ -4128,10 +4135,10 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_port_split(struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core, u8 local_port,
 		return max_width;
 	}
 
-	/* Split port with non-max module width cannot be split. */
-	if (mlxsw_sp_port->mapping.width != max_width) {
-		netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Port cannot be split further\n");
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port cannot be split further");
+	/* Split port with non-max and 1 module width cannot be split. */
+	if (mlxsw_sp_port->mapping.width != max_width || max_width == 1) {
+		netdev_err(mlxsw_sp_port->dev, "Port cannot be split\n");
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Port cannot be split");
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.21.0