lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 1 Nov 2019 21:59:05 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: [net-next 05/15] net/mlx5e: Verify that rule has at least one
 fwd/drop action

From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>

Currently, mlx5 tc layer doesn't verify that rule has at least one forward
or drop action which leads to following firmware syndrome when user tries
to offload such action:

[ 1824.860501] mlx5_core 0000:81:00.0: mlx5_cmd_check:753:(pid 29458): SET_FLOW_TABLE_ENTRY(0x936) op_mod(0x0) failed, status bad parameter(0x3), syndrome (0x144b7a)

Add check at the end of parse_tc_fdb_actions() that verifies that resulting
attribute has action fwd or drop flag set.

Signed-off-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...lanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index 3e78a727f3e6..8c4bce940bfb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -3423,6 +3423,12 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
 		attr->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST;
 	}
 
+	if (!(attr->action &
+	      (MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST | MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_DROP))) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Rule must have at least one forward/drop action");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	if (attr->split_count > 0 && !mlx5_esw_has_fwd_fdb(priv->mdev)) {
 		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
 				   "current firmware doesn't support split rule for port mirroring");
-- 
2.21.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ