[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2066bc6-2191-5b9d-ff59-2ba4a95bfa03@gmx.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Nov 2019 10:48:17 +0100
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/6] net: bcmgenet: use optional max DMA burst size
property
Hi Florian,
Am 02.11.19 um 20:34 schrieb Florian Fainelli:
> On 11/2/2019 6:41 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> From: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
>>
>> Depending on the HW, the maximal usable DMA burst size can vary.
>> If not set accordingly a timeout in the transmit queue happens and no
>> package can be sent. Read to optional max-burst-sz property, if not
>> present, fallback to the standard value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>
> Missing your Signed-off-by here since you are carrying this patch from
> Matthias.
oops
>
>> ---
> [snip]
>
>> + if (dn) {
>> + of_property_read_u32(dn, "dma-burst-sz",
>> + &priv->dma_max_burst_length);
>> + } else {
>> + priv->dma_max_burst_length = DMA_MAX_BURST_LENGTH;
>> + }
> I would maintain the previous position provided on Matthias' patch
> series, which is the integration of the GENETv5 hardware block in 2711
> is done in a way that is different enough (due to the SCB/AXI bridge)
> that a separate compatibility string would be in order. Once you that
> defined that "brcm,bcm2711-genet-v5" compatibility string defined, you
> can derive the DMA burst size off of it.
this is what i meant with didn't address all your comments. I'm fine
with your suggestion, but too lazy to integrate it in this patch series.
I assumed Matthias already take care of it.
> If adding a compatibility string is not practical because of the
> downstream DTBs, then can we at least fix this patch in two ways:
>
> - define the property in the binding document
> - spell out the property in full names: max-dma-burst-size so as to
> reflect what it does
In case of incompatibilities with the downstream DTB, i will take care
of it in the downstream tree like last time.
Regards
Stefan
>
> Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists