[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <69baa44c928ae7f6ca1f4631b7beb6b2c2b1c033.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 08:28:57 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] mac80211: Use debugfs_create_xul() helper
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 11:41 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Use the new debugfs_create_xul() helper instead of open-coding the same
> operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Sorry Greg, this slipped through on my side.
Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Do you prefer to take this to your tree still, or should I pick it up
later once debugfs_create_xul() is available (to me)?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists