[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89iL8ox5P8MrMBCGssz7g2euPieTPK3Vx9Lxo93eVAoE7mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 14:53:36 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] net_sched: extend packet counter to 64bit
On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 2:49 PM Jakub Kicinski
<jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 19:13:14 -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/net/gen_stats.h b/include/net/gen_stats.h
> > index 5f3889e7ec1bb8b5148e9c552dd222b7f1c077d8..1424e02cef90c0139a175933577f1b8537bce51a 100644
> > --- a/include/net/gen_stats.h
> > +++ b/include/net/gen_stats.h
> > @@ -10,8 +10,8 @@
> > /* Note: this used to be in include/uapi/linux/gen_stats.h */
> > struct gnet_stats_basic_packed {
> > __u64 bytes;
> > - __u32 packets;
> > -} __attribute__ ((packed));
> > + __u64 packets;
> > +};
>
> nit: if there needs to be a respin for other reason perhaps worth
> s/__u/u/ as this is no longer a uAPI structure?
Yes, I had this in my mind, we have __u32 all over the places, with a
mix of u32/__u32 in some classes :/
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists