netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] UDP tunnel encapsulation module for tunnelling different protocols like MPLS,IP,NSH etc.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20191107183136.466013d1@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 18:31:36 +0100
From:   Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc:     Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@...il.com>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, scott.drennan@...ia.com,
        martin.varghese@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] UDP tunnel encapsulation module for
 tunnelling different protocols like MPLS,IP,NSH etc.

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 11:35:07 -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> If the bareudp device binds to a specific port on all local addresses,
> which I think it's doing judging from what it passes to udp_sock_create
> (but I may very well be missing something), then in6addr_any alone will
> suffice to receive both v6 and v4 packets.

This will not work when IPv6 is disabled, either by the kernel config
or administratively. We do need to have two sockets.

 Jiri