[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191107200506.04242e5d@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 20:05:06 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@...il.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, scott.drennan@...ia.com,
martin.varghese@...ia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] UDP tunnel encapsulation module for
tunnelling different protocols like MPLS,IP,NSH etc.
On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 13:59:23 -0500, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> This still needs only one socket, right? Just fall back to inet if
> ipv6 is disabled.
What would happen if IPv6 is disabled while the tunnel is operating?
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists