[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191108132230.GK6990@nanopsycho>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 14:22:30 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, saeedm@...lanox.com,
kwankhede@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, cohuck@...hat.com,
jiri@...lanox.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 09/19] vfio/mdev: Expose mdev alias in sysfs tree
Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:08:24PM CET, parav@...lanox.com wrote:
[...]
>
>+static ssize_t alias_show(struct device *device,
>+ struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>+{
>+ struct mdev_device *dev = mdev_from_dev(device);
>+
>+ if (!dev->alias)
>+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>+
>+ return sprintf(buf, "%s\n", dev->alias);
>+}
>+static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(alias);
I wonder, rather than adding another sysfs file, why the alias can't be
simply a symlink to the aliased mdev directory?
>+
> static const struct attribute *mdev_device_attrs[] = {
>+ &dev_attr_alias.attr,
> &dev_attr_remove.attr,
> NULL,
> };
>--
>2.19.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists