[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM0PR05MB4866A2D97171BDE4AC451B42D17B0@AM0PR05MB4866.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 16:03:58 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
CC: "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 07/19] vfio/mdev: Introduce sha1 based mdev alias
Hi Cornelia,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 8, 2019 5:11 AM
> To: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com; davem@...emloft.net;
> kvm@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; Saeed Mahameed
> <saeedm@...lanox.com>; kwankhede@...dia.com; leon@...nel.org; Jiri
> Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>; linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 07/19] vfio/mdev: Introduce sha1 based mdev
> alias
>
> On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 10:08:22 -0600
> Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com> wrote:
>
> > Some vendor drivers want an identifier for an mdev device that is
> > shorter than the UUID, due to length restrictions in the consumers of
> > that identifier.
> >
> > Add a callback that allows a vendor driver to request an alias of a
> > specified length to be generated for an mdev device. If generated,
> > that alias is checked for collisions.
> >
> > It is an optional attribute.
> > mdev alias is generated using sha1 from the mdev name.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_core.c | 123
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_private.h | 5 +-
> > drivers/vfio/mdev/mdev_sysfs.c | 13 ++--
> > include/linux/mdev.h | 4 +
> > 4 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> Is this (or any of the other mdev alias patches) different from what I
> reviewed in the past?
No. It is not. They are same as what you already reviewed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists