lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2019 21:12:20 -0500 From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com> To: Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com> Cc: "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, "kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>, "cohuck@...hat.com" <cohuck@...hat.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>, "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/19] Mellanox, mlx5 sub function support On Fri, 8 Nov 2019 01:49:09 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote: > > > What I remember discussing offline/mailing list is > > > (a) exposing mdev/sub fuctions as devlink sub ports is not so good > > > abstraction > > > (b) user creating/deleting eswitch sub ports would be hard to fit in > > > the whole usage model > > > > Okay, so I can repost the "basic" sub functions? > > > I think so. Would you like post on top of this series as port flavour > etc would come by default? Also there is vfio/mdev dependency exist > in this series... I don't mind the ordering.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists