lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191108064039.2041889-2-ast@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 7 Nov 2019 22:40:22 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
To:     <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <daniel@...earbox.net>, <x86@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/18] bpf: refactor x86 JIT into helpers

Refactor x86 JITing of LDX, STX, CALL instructions into separate helper
functions.  No functional changes in LDX and STX helpers.  There is a minor
change in CALL helper. It will populate target address correctly on the first
pass of JIT instead of second pass. That won't reduce total number of JIT
passes though.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8cd23d8309bf..0399b1f83c23 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -198,6 +198,8 @@ struct jit_context {
 /* Maximum number of bytes emitted while JITing one eBPF insn */
 #define BPF_MAX_INSN_SIZE	128
 #define BPF_INSN_SAFETY		64
+/* number of bytes emit_call() needs to generate call instruction */
+#define X86_CALL_SIZE		5
 
 #define PROLOGUE_SIZE		20
 
@@ -390,6 +392,100 @@ static void emit_mov_reg(u8 **pprog, bool is64, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg)
 	*pprog = prog;
 }
 
+/* LDX: dst_reg = *(u8*)(src_reg + off) */
+static void emit_ldx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
+{
+	u8 *prog = *pprog;
+	int cnt = 0;
+
+	switch (size) {
+	case BPF_B:
+		/* Emit 'movzx rax, byte ptr [rax + off]' */
+		EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB6);
+		break;
+	case BPF_H:
+		/* Emit 'movzx rax, word ptr [rax + off]' */
+		EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB7);
+		break;
+	case BPF_W:
+		/* Emit 'mov eax, dword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
+		if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
+			EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
+		else
+			EMIT1(0x8B);
+		break;
+	case BPF_DW:
+		/* Emit 'mov rax, qword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
+		EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
+		break;
+	}
+	/*
+	 * If insn->off == 0 we can save one extra byte, but
+	 * special case of x86 R13 which always needs an offset
+	 * is not worth the hassle
+	 */
+	if (is_imm8(off))
+		EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), off);
+	else
+		EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, src_reg, dst_reg), off);
+	*pprog = prog;
+}
+
+/* STX: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = src_reg */
+static void emit_stx(u8 **pprog, u32 size, u32 dst_reg, u32 src_reg, int off)
+{
+	u8 *prog = *pprog;
+	int cnt = 0;
+
+	switch (size) {
+	case BPF_B:
+		/* Emit 'mov byte ptr [rax + off], al' */
+		if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg) ||
+		    /* We have to add extra byte for x86 SIL, DIL regs */
+		    src_reg == BPF_REG_1 || src_reg == BPF_REG_2)
+			EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x88);
+		else
+			EMIT1(0x88);
+		break;
+	case BPF_H:
+		if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
+			EMIT3(0x66, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
+		else
+			EMIT2(0x66, 0x89);
+		break;
+	case BPF_W:
+		if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
+			EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
+		else
+			EMIT1(0x89);
+		break;
+	case BPF_DW:
+		EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
+		break;
+	}
+	if (is_imm8(off))
+		EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), off);
+	else
+		EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, dst_reg, src_reg),
+			    off);
+	*pprog = prog;
+}
+
+static int emit_call(u8 **pprog, void *func, void *ip)
+{
+	u8 *prog = *pprog;
+	int cnt = 0;
+	s64 offset;
+
+	offset = func - (ip + X86_CALL_SIZE);
+	if (!is_simm32(offset)) {
+		pr_err("Target call %p is out of range\n", func);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	EMIT1_off32(0xE8, offset);
+	*pprog = prog;
+	return 0;
+}
 
 static bool ex_handler_bpf(const struct exception_table_entry *x,
 			   struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr,
@@ -773,68 +869,22 @@ st:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 
 			/* STX: *(u8*)(dst_reg + off) = src_reg */
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
-			/* Emit 'mov byte ptr [rax + off], al' */
-			if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg) ||
-			    /* We have to add extra byte for x86 SIL, DIL regs */
-			    src_reg == BPF_REG_1 || src_reg == BPF_REG_2)
-				EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x88);
-			else
-				EMIT1(0x88);
-			goto stx;
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
-			if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
-				EMIT3(0x66, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
-			else
-				EMIT2(0x66, 0x89);
-			goto stx;
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
-			if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
-				EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
-			else
-				EMIT1(0x89);
-			goto stx;
 		case BPF_STX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
-			EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x89);
-stx:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
-				EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), insn->off);
-			else
-				EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, dst_reg, src_reg),
-					    insn->off);
+			emit_stx(&prog, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), dst_reg, src_reg, insn->off);
 			break;
 
 			/* LDX: dst_reg = *(u8*)(src_reg + off) */
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_B:
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_B:
-			/* Emit 'movzx rax, byte ptr [rax + off]' */
-			EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB6);
-			goto ldx;
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_H:
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_H:
-			/* Emit 'movzx rax, word ptr [rax + off]' */
-			EMIT3(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x0F, 0xB7);
-			goto ldx;
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_W:
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_W:
-			/* Emit 'mov eax, dword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
-			if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg))
-				EMIT2(add_2mod(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
-			else
-				EMIT1(0x8B);
-			goto ldx;
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_MEM | BPF_DW:
 		case BPF_LDX | BPF_PROBE_MEM | BPF_DW:
-			/* Emit 'mov rax, qword ptr [rax+0x14]' */
-			EMIT2(add_2mod(0x48, src_reg, dst_reg), 0x8B);
-ldx:			/*
-			 * If insn->off == 0 we can save one extra byte, but
-			 * special case of x86 R13 which always needs an offset
-			 * is not worth the hassle
-			 */
-			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
-				EMIT2(add_2reg(0x40, src_reg, dst_reg), insn->off);
-			else
-				EMIT1_off32(add_2reg(0x80, src_reg, dst_reg),
-					    insn->off);
+			emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_SIZE(insn->code), dst_reg, src_reg, insn->off);
 			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) {
 				struct exception_table_entry *ex;
 				u8 *_insn = image + proglen;
@@ -899,13 +949,8 @@ xadd:			if (is_imm8(insn->off))
 			/* call */
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL:
 			func = (u8 *) __bpf_call_base + imm32;
-			jmp_offset = func - (image + addrs[i]);
-			if (!imm32 || !is_simm32(jmp_offset)) {
-				pr_err("unsupported BPF func %d addr %p image %p\n",
-				       imm32, func, image);
+			if (!imm32 || emit_call(&prog, func, image + addrs[i - 1]))
 				return -EINVAL;
-			}
-			EMIT1_off32(0xE8, jmp_offset);
 			break;
 
 		case BPF_JMP | BPF_TAIL_CALL:
-- 
2.23.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ