[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:10:50 -0700
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, x86@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/18] bpf: Add bpf_arch_text_poke() helper
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 09:14:03 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:39:24PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2019 22:36:24 +0100
> >
> > > The cover leter is not preserved and should therefore
> > ...
> >
> > The cover letter is +ALWAYS+ preserved, we put them in the merge
> > commit.
>
> Good to know; is this a netdev special? I've not seen this before.
I read a *lot* of merge commit changelogs; it's not just netdev that does
this. I try to do it with significant documentation sets as well. I
agree that changelogs should contain all relevant information, but there
is value in an overview as well. But then, I make my living in the
overview business...:)
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists