lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:19:43 +0000
From:   Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
To:     Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
CC:     Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vinicius.gomes@...el.com" <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
        Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
        Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>, Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
        Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>, Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [net-next, 1/2] enetc: Configure the Time-Aware
 Scheduler via tc-taprio offload




Br,
Po Liu

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
> Sent: 2019年11月12日 17:41
> To: Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>; davem@...emloft.net; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; vinicius.gomes@...el.com;
> Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>; Alexandru Marginean
> <alexandru.marginean@....com>; Xiaoliang Yang
> <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>; Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>; Mingkai Hu
> <mingkai.hu@....com>; Jerry Huang <jerry.huang@....com>; Leo Li
> <leoyang.li@....com>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [net-next, 1/2] enetc: Configure the Time-Aware Scheduler via
> tc-taprio offload
> 
> Caution: EXT Email
> 
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 04:41:26AM +0000, Po Liu wrote:
> > ENETC supports in hardware for time-based egress shaping according to
> > IEEE 802.1Qbv. This patch implement the Qbv enablement by the hardware
> > offload method qdisc tc-taprio method.
> > Also update cbdr writeback to up level since control bd ring may
> > writeback data to control bd ring.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Po Liu <Po.Liu@....com>
> > Singed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile |   1 +
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c  |  19 ++-
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h  |   2 +
> >  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c |   5 +-
> >  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h   | 150 ++++++++++++++++--
> >  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c  | 130 +++++++++++++++
> >  6 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)  create mode
> > 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > index d200c27c3bf6..389f722efc43 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/Makefile
> > @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ common-objs := enetc.o enetc_cbdr.o enetc_ethtool.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC) += fsl-enetc.o  fsl-enetc-y := enetc_pf.o
> > enetc_mdio.o $(common-objs)
> >  fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_PCI_IOV) += enetc_msg.o
> > +fsl-enetc-$(CONFIG_NET_SCH_TAPRIO) += enetc_qos.o
> >
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_ENETC_VF) += fsl-enetc-vf.o  fsl-enetc-vf-y :=
> > enetc_vf.o $(common-objs) diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > index 3e8f9819f08c..d58dbc2c4270 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c
> > @@ -1427,8 +1427,7 @@ int enetc_close(struct net_device *ndev)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> > -                void *type_data)
> > +int enetc_setup_tc_mqprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data)
> >  {
> >       struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> >       struct tc_mqprio_qopt *mqprio = type_data; @@ -1436,9 +1435,6 @@
> > int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> >       u8 num_tc;
> >       int i;
> >
> > -     if (type != TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQPRIO)
> > -             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > -
> >       mqprio->hw = TC_MQPRIO_HW_OFFLOAD_TCS;
> >       num_tc = mqprio->num_tc;
> >
> > @@ -1483,6 +1479,19 @@ int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev,
> enum tc_setup_type type,
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +int enetc_setup_tc(struct net_device *ndev, enum tc_setup_type type,
> > +                void *type_data)
> > +{
> > +     switch (type) {
> > +     case TC_SETUP_QDISC_MQPRIO:
> > +             return enetc_setup_tc_mqprio(ndev, type_data);
> > +     case TC_SETUP_QDISC_TAPRIO:
> > +             return enetc_setup_tc_taprio(ndev, type_data);
> > +     default:
> > +             return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> >  struct net_device_stats *enetc_get_stats(struct net_device *ndev)  {
> >       struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); diff --git
> > a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > index 541b4e2073fe..8676631041d5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > @@ -244,3 +244,5 @@ int enetc_set_fs_entry(struct enetc_si *si, struct
> > enetc_cmd_rfse *rfse,  void enetc_set_rss_key(struct enetc_hw *hw,
> > const u8 *bytes);  int enetc_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32
> > *table, int count);  int enetc_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si,
> > const u32 *table, int count);
> > +int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd); int
> > +enetc_setup_tc_taprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data);
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > index de466b71bf8f..201cbc362e33 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static int enetc_cbd_unused(struct enetc_cbdr *r)
> >               r->bd_count;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd)
> > +int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd)
> >  {
> >       struct enetc_cbdr *ring = &si->cbd_ring;
> >       int timeout = ENETC_CBDR_TIMEOUT; @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ static int
> > enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd)
> >       if (!timeout)
> >               return -EBUSY;
> >
> > +     /* CBD may writeback data, feedback up level */
> > +     *cbd = *dest_cbd;
> > +
> >       enetc_clean_cbdr(si);
> >
> >       return 0;
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > index 88276299f447..75a7c0f1f8ce 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h
> > @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
> >  #define ENETC_SICTR0 0x18
> >  #define ENETC_SICTR1 0x1c
> >  #define ENETC_SIPCAPR0       0x20
> > +#define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_QBV   BIT(4)
> >  #define ENETC_SIPCAPR0_RSS   BIT(8)
> >  #define ENETC_SIPCAPR1       0x24
> >  #define ENETC_SITGTGR        0x30
> > @@ -148,6 +149,12 @@ enum enetc_bdr_type {TX, RX};
> >  #define ENETC_PORT_BASE              0x10000
> >  #define ENETC_PMR            0x0000
> >  #define ENETC_PMR_EN GENMASK(18, 16)
> > +#define ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_MASK GENMASK(11, 8) #define
> > +ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_10M 0x000 #define ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_100M
> 0x100
> > +#define ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_1000M 0x200 #define
> ENETC_PMR_PSPEED_2500M
> > +0x400
> 
> Perhaps BIT() is appropriate here.

Will change to BIT().

> 
> The changes above to enetc_hw.h are not used until the following patch,
> perhaps it would be better if they were part of that patch.
>
Yes, better to move to patch 2/2.

> > +
> >  #define ENETC_PSR            0x0004 /* RO */
> >  #define ENETC_PSIPMR         0x0018
> >  #define ENETC_PSIPMR_SET_UP(n)       BIT(n) /* n = SI index */
> > @@ -440,22 +447,6 @@ union enetc_rx_bd {
> >  #define EMETC_MAC_ADDR_FILT_RES      3 /* # of reserved entries at the
> beginning */
> >  #define ENETC_MAX_NUM_VFS    2
> >
> > -struct enetc_cbd {
> > -     union {
> > -             struct {
> > -                     __le32 addr[2];
> > -                     __le32 opt[4];
> > -             };
> > -             __le32 data[6];
> > -     };
> > -     __le16 index;
> > -     __le16 length;
> > -     u8 cmd;
> > -     u8 cls;
> > -     u8 _res;
> > -     u8 status_flags;
> > -};
> > -
> >  #define ENETC_CBD_FLAGS_SF   BIT(7) /* short format */
> >  #define ENETC_CBD_STATUS_MASK        0xf
> >
> > @@ -554,3 +545,130 @@ static inline void enetc_set_bdr_prio(struct
> enetc_hw *hw, int bdr_idx,
> >       val |= ENETC_TBMR_SET_PRIO(prio);
> >       enetc_txbdr_wr(hw, bdr_idx, ENETC_TBMR, val);  }
> > +
> > +enum bdcr_cmd_class {
> > +     BDCR_CMD_UNSPEC = 0,
> > +     BDCR_CMD_MAC_FILTER,
> > +     BDCR_CMD_VLAN_FILTER,
> > +     BDCR_CMD_RSS,
> > +     BDCR_CMD_RFS,
> > +     BDCR_CMD_PORT_GCL,
> > +     BDCR_CMD_RECV_CLASSIFIER,
> > +     __BDCR_CMD_MAX_LEN,
> > +     BDCR_CMD_MAX_LEN = __BDCR_CMD_MAX_LEN - 1, };
> > +
> > +/* class 5, command 0 */
> > +struct tgs_gcl_conf {
> > +     u8      atc;    /* init gate value */
> > +     u8      res[7];
> > +     union {
> > +             struct {
> > +                     u8      res1[4];
> > +                     __le16  acl_len;
> 
> Given that u* types are used in this structure I think le16 would be more
> appropriate than __le16.
 
Here keep the same code style of this .h file. I think it is better to have another patch to fix them all. Do you agree?

> 
> > +                     u8      res2[2];
> > +             };
> > +             struct {
> > +                     u32 cctl;
> > +                     u32 ccth;
> > +             };
> 
> I'm a little surprised to see host endian values in a structure that appears to be
> written to hardware. Is this intentional?

Will remove.

> 
> Also, these fields do not seem to be used in this patch-set.
> Is that also intentional?

This is defined hardware writeback value, can be remove temporary.

> 
> > +     };
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_IOMEN BIT(0)
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_IPVEN BIT(3)
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_GTST  BIT(4)
> > +#define ENETC_CBDR_SGL_IPV_MASK 0xe
> 
> Perhaps GENMASK() is appropriate here and elsewhere for generating masks.
> 

Will remove these define in this patch.

> > +
> > +/* gate control list entry */
> > +struct gce {
> > +     u32     period;
> 
> Likewise, I'm a little surprised to see host-byte order data to be written to HW.
> And below too. Though as I've noted below, some of these values are used to
> store le32 data, so it seems that the types are incorrect

Ok.  change to le32.

> 
> > +     u8      gate;
> > +     u8      res[3];
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* tgs_gcl_conf address point to this data space */ struct
> > +tgs_gcl_data {
> > +     u32     btl;
> > +     u32     bth;
> > +     u32     ct;
> > +     u32     cte;
> > +};
> > +

Ok. change to le32.

> > +/* class 5, command 1 */
> > +struct tgs_gcl_query {
> > +             u8      res[12];
> > +             union {
> > +                     struct {
> > +                             __le16  acl_len; /* admin list length */
> > +                             __le16  ocl_len; /* operation list length */
> > +                     };
> > +                     struct {
> > +                             u16 admin_list_len;
> > +                             u16 oper_list_len;
> 
>         Again, is it intentional that these are a) host-byte order and
>         b) unused?

Ok. Can be remove temporary.

> 
> > +                     };
> > +             };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* tgs_gcl_query command response data format */ struct tgs_gcl_resp
> > +{
> > +     u32 abtl;       /* base time */
> > +     u32 abth;
> > +     u32 act;        /* cycle time */
> > +     u32 acte;       /* cycle time extend */
> > +     u32 cctl;       /* config change time */
> > +     u32 ccth;
> > +     u32 obtl;       /* operation base time */
> > +     u32 obth;
> > +     u32 oct;        /* operation cycle time */
> > +     u32 octe;       /* operation cycle time extend */
> > +     u32 ccel;       /* config change error */
> > +     u32 cceh;
> > +};
> 
> This structure seems unused in this patchset.

Will remove.

> 
> > +
> > +struct enetc_cbd {
> > +     union{
> > +             struct {
> > +                     __le32  addr[2];
> > +                     union {
> > +                             __le32  opt[4];
> > +                             struct tgs_gcl_conf     gcl_conf;
> > +                             struct tgs_gcl_query    gcl_query;
> > +                     };
> > +             };      /* Long format */
> > +             __le32 data[6];
> > +     };
> > +     __le16 index;
> > +     __le16 length;
> > +     u8 cmd;
> > +     u8 cls;
> > +     u8 _res;
> > +     u8 status_flags;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define ENETC_PTCFPR(n)              (0x1910 + (n) * 4) /* n = [0 ..7] */
> > +#define ENETC_FPE            BIT(31)
> > +
> > +/* Port capability register 0 */
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_PSFPM   BIT(10)
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_PSFP    BIT(9)
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_TSN     BIT(4)
> > +#define ENETC_PCAPR0_QBU     BIT(3)
> > +
> > +/* port time gating control register */
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET               0x11a00
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_TGE                        0x80000000
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_TGPE                       BIT(30)
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_TGDROP_DISABLE     BIT(29)
> > +
> > +/* Port time gating capability register */
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_PTGCAPR_OFFSET     0x11a08
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_MAX_GCL_LEN_MASK   0xffff
> > +
> > +/* Port time gating admin gate list status register */
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_PTGAGLSR_OFFSET    0x11a10
> > +#define ENETC_QBV_CFG_PEND_MASK      0x00000002
> > +
> > +#define ENETC_TGLSTR                 0xa200
> > +#define ENETC_TGS_MIN_DIS_MASK               0x80000000
> > +#define ENETC_MIN_LOOKAHEAD_MASK     0xffff
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..036bb39c7a0b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_qos.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-3-Clause)
> > +/* Copyright 2019 NXP */
> > +
> > +#include "enetc.h"
> > +
> > +#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
> > +
> > +static u16 enetc_get_max_gcl_len(struct enetc_hw *hw) {
> > +     return enetc_rd(hw, ENETC_QBV_PTGCAPR_OFFSET)
> > +             & ENETC_QBV_MAX_GCL_LEN_MASK; }
> > +
> > +static int enetc_setup_taprio(struct net_device *ndev,
> > +                           struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload *admin_conf)
> > +{
> > +     struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +     struct enetc_cbd cbd = {.cmd = 0};
> > +     struct tgs_gcl_conf *gcl_config;
> > +     struct tgs_gcl_data *gcl_data;
> > +     struct gce *gce;
> > +     dma_addr_t dma;
> > +     u16 data_size;
> > +     u16 gcl_len;
> > +     u32 temp;
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     gcl_len = admin_conf->num_entries;
> > +     if (gcl_len > enetc_get_max_gcl_len(&priv->si->hw))
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +     if (admin_conf->enable) {
> > +             enetc_wr(&priv->si->hw,
> > +                      ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET,
> > +                      temp & (~ENETC_QBV_TGE));
> 
> The enetc_wr() call seems to be common to both arms of the condition.
> If so perhaps it could be move outside of the condition.

Ok. will move it down after the if condition.

> 
> > +             usleep_range(10, 20);
> > +             enetc_wr(&priv->si->hw,
> > +                      ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET,
> > +                      temp | ENETC_QBV_TGE);
> > +     } else {
> > +             enetc_wr(&priv->si->hw,
> > +                      ENETC_QBV_PTGCR_OFFSET,
> > +                      temp & (~ENETC_QBV_TGE));
> > +             return 0;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     /* Configure the (administrative) gate control list using the
> > +      * control BD descriptor.
> > +      */
> > +     gcl_config = &cbd.gcl_conf;
> > +
> > +     data_size = sizeof(struct tgs_gcl_data) + gcl_len *
> > + sizeof(struct gce);
> 
> I think struct_size() can be used here.

Ok.

> 
> > +
> > +     gcl_data = kzalloc(data_size, __GFP_DMA | GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!gcl_data)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     gce = (struct gce *)(gcl_data + 1);
> > +
> > +     /* Since no initial state config in taprio, set gates open as default.
> > +      */
> > +     gcl_config->atc = 0xff;
> > +     gcl_config->acl_len = cpu_to_le16(gcl_len);
> > +
> > +     if (!admin_conf->base_time) {
> > +             gcl_data->btl =
> > +                     cpu_to_le32(enetc_rd(&priv->si->hw, ENETC_SICTR0));
> > +             gcl_data->bth =
> > +                     cpu_to_le32(enetc_rd(&priv->si->hw, ENETC_SICTR1));
> > +     } else {
> > +             gcl_data->btl =
> > +                     cpu_to_le32(lower_32_bits(admin_conf->base_time));
> > +             gcl_data->bth =
> > +                     cpu_to_le32(upper_32_bits(admin_conf->base_time));
> > +     }
> 
> It looks like the types of the btl and bth fields are u32.
> Perhaps they should be le32?

Ok. should be le32.

> 
> Please consider running sparse over this code to check for any endian problems.
> 
> > +
> > +     gcl_data->ct = cpu_to_le32(admin_conf->cycle_time);
> > +     gcl_data->cte = cpu_to_le32(admin_conf->cycle_time_extension);
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < gcl_len; i++) {
> > +             struct tc_taprio_sched_entry *temp_entry;
> > +             struct gce *temp_gce = gce + i;
> > +
> > +             temp_entry = &admin_conf->entries[i];
> > +
> > +             temp_gce->gate = cpu_to_le32(temp_entry->gate_mask);
> 
>         Gate is a u8 followed by 3 reserved bytes.
>         Perhaps there needs to be some bounds checking on
>         the value stored there given that the source is 32bits wide.
> 
>         Also, its not clear to me that the above logic, which I assume
>         takes the last significant byte of a 32bit value, works on
>         big endian systems as the 32bit value is always little endian.

temp_entry->gate_mask is 32bit for wide possible input. Here change to hardware set 8bit wide.
Can it just be like:
	temp_gce->gate = (u8) temp_entry->gate_mask;

> 
> > +             temp_gce->period = cpu_to_le32(temp_entry->interval);
> 
>         It looks like the types of the gate field is u32.
>         Perhaps it should be le32?

Ok. should be le32.

> 
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     cbd.length = cpu_to_le16(data_size);
> > +     cbd.status_flags = 0;
> > +
> > +     dma = dma_map_single(&priv->si->pdev->dev, gcl_data,
> > +                          data_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > +     if (dma_mapping_error(&priv->si->pdev->dev, dma)) {
> > +             netdev_err(priv->si->ndev, "DMA mapping failed!\n");
> > +             kfree(gcl_data);
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     cbd.addr[0] = lower_32_bits(dma);
> > +     cbd.addr[1] = upper_32_bits(dma);
> > +     cbd.cls = BDCR_CMD_PORT_GCL;
> > +
> > +     /* Updated by ENETC on completion of the configuration
> > +      * command. A zero value indicates success.
> > +      */
> > +     cbd.status_flags = 0;
> > +
> > +     enetc_send_cmd(priv->si, &cbd);
> > +
> > +     dma_unmap_single(&priv->si->pdev->dev, dma, data_size,
> DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> > +     kfree(gcl_data);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int enetc_setup_tc_taprio(struct net_device *ndev, void *type_data) {
> > +     struct tc_taprio_qopt_offload *taprio = type_data;
> > +     struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < priv->num_tx_rings; i++)
> > +             enetc_set_bdr_prio(&priv->si->hw,
> > +                                priv->tx_ring[i]->index,
> > +                                taprio->enable ? i : 0);
> > +
> > +     return enetc_setup_taprio(ndev, taprio); }
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ