[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hpZMCRmw+sEPUeb_8TdxCcLNj16Uni-+bmA22+Sx5i1Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 18:18:27 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Joergen Andreasen <joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com>,
"Allan W. Nielsen" <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/12] net: mscc: ocelot: publish structure
definitions to include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 at 16:42, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h b/include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h
>
> ..
>
> > +#else
> > +
> > +/* I/O */
> > +u32 ocelot_port_readl(struct ocelot_port *port, u32 reg)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> These stubs are for when the core is missing? I don't think that makes
> sense. What use is a DSA or switchdev driver without the core? I would
> put in a hard dependency in the Kconfig, so the DSA driver can only be
> built when the core is available, and skip these stubs.
>
> Andrew
Yes it doesn't make too much sense, I was on the fence about adding it
and then just decided to play on the safe side. I'll remove it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists