[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191112111750.2168b131@cakuba>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:17:50 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/3] bpf: add mmap() support for
BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 18:06:42 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> So let's say if sizeof(struct bpf_array) is 300, then I'd have to either:
>
> - somehow make sure that I allocate 4k (for data) + 300 (for struct
> bpf_array) in such a way that those 4k of data are 4k-aligned. Is
> there any way to do that?
> - assuming there isn't, then another way would be to allocate entire
> 4k page for struct bpf_array itself, but put it at the end of that
> page, so that 4k of data is 4k-aligned. While wasteful, the bigger
> problem is that pointer to bpf_array is not a pointer to allocated
> memory anymore, so we'd need to remember that and adjust address
> before calling vfree().
>
> Were you suggesting #2 as a solution? Or am I missing some other way to do this?
I am suggesting #2, that's the way to do it in the kernel.
You could make the assumption that if you're allocating memory aligned
to PAGE_SIZE, the address for vfree() is:
addr = map;
if (map->flags & MMAPABLE)
addr = round_down(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
vfree(addr);
Just make a note of the fact that we depend on vmalloc()s alignment in
bpf_map_area_alloc().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists