[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191113002128.GA3419@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 21:21:28 -0300
From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Ariel Levkovich <lariel@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 8/8] net/mlx5: Add vf ACL access via tc flower
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 03:41:24PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Nov 2019 17:13:53 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > From: Ariel Levkovich <lariel@...lanox.com>
> >
> > Implementing vf ACL access via tc flower api to allow
> > admins configure the allowed vlan ids on a vf interface.
> >
> > To add a vlan id to a vf's ingress/egress ACL table while
> > in legacy sriov mode, the implementation intercepts tc flows
> > created on the pf device where the flower matching keys include
> > the vf's mac address as the src_mac (eswitch ingress) or the
> > dst_mac (eswitch egress) while the action is accept.
> >
> > In such cases, the mlx5 driver interpets these flows as adding
> > a vlan id to the vf's ingress/egress ACL table and updates
> > the rules in that table using eswitch ACL configuration api
> > that is introduced in a previous patch.
>
> Nack, the magic interpretation of rules installed on the PF is a no go.
+1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists