[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115105455.24a4dd48@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:54:55 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] tcp: switch snprintf to scnprintf
On Fri, 15 Nov 2019 10:41:06 +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > We need to properly size the output buffers before using them,
> > we can not afford truncating silently the output.
>
> Yes, I agree. Just as I said, the buffer is still enough, while scnprintf
> is just a safer usage compired with snprintf.
So maybe keep snprintf but add WARN_ON and bail out of the loop if the
buffer size was reached?
if (WARN_ON(offs >= maxlen))
break;
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists