[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115135318.GB2158@nanopsycho>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 14:53:18 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nirranjan@...lsio.com,
vishal@...lsio.com, dt@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] cxgb4: add TC-MATCHALL classifier
ingress offload
Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:14:21PM CET, rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com wrote:
[...]
>@@ -26,9 +37,13 @@ struct cxgb4_tc_matchall {
> };
>
> int cxgb4_tc_matchall_replace(struct net_device *dev,
>- struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall);
>+ struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall,
>+ bool ingress);
> int cxgb4_tc_matchall_destroy(struct net_device *dev,
>- struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall);
>+ struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall,
>+ bool ingress);
>+int cxgb4_tc_matchall_stats(struct net_device *dev,
>+ struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall);
Hmm, you only add stats function in this second patch. Does that mean
you don't care for stats in egress?
>From looking at cxgb_setup_tc_matchall() looks like I'm right.
Why?
>
> int cxgb4_init_tc_matchall(struct adapter *adap);
> void cxgb4_cleanup_tc_matchall(struct adapter *adap);
>--
>2.24.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists