[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191115151046.GA14367@chelsio.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 20:40:47 +0530
From: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, nirranjan@...lsio.com,
vishal@...lsio.com, dt@...lsio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] cxgb4: add TC-MATCHALL classifier
ingress offload
On Friday, November 11/15/19, 2019 at 14:53:18 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:14:21PM CET, rahul.lakkireddy@...lsio.com wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>
> >@@ -26,9 +37,13 @@ struct cxgb4_tc_matchall {
> > };
> >
> > int cxgb4_tc_matchall_replace(struct net_device *dev,
> >- struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall);
> >+ struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall,
> >+ bool ingress);
> > int cxgb4_tc_matchall_destroy(struct net_device *dev,
> >- struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall);
> >+ struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall,
> >+ bool ingress);
> >+int cxgb4_tc_matchall_stats(struct net_device *dev,
> >+ struct tc_cls_matchall_offload *cls_matchall);
>
> Hmm, you only add stats function in this second patch. Does that mean
> you don't care for stats in egress?
> From looking at cxgb_setup_tc_matchall() looks like I'm right.
> Why?
>
We're currently missing support to fetch these stats from hardware/
firmware on egress side. So, I could only implement it for the ingress
side for now.
> >
> > int cxgb4_init_tc_matchall(struct adapter *adap);
> > void cxgb4_cleanup_tc_matchall(struct adapter *adap);
> >--
> >2.24.0
> >
Thanks,
Rahul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists