netdev - Re: [PATCH] vrf: Fix possible NULL pointer oops when delete nic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7fe948a8-debd-e336-9584-e66153e90701@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Nov 2019 09:59:47 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     "wangxiaogang (F)" <wangxiaogang3@...wei.com>, dsahern@...nel.org,
        shrijeet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        hujunwei4@...wei.com, xuhanbing@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vrf: Fix possible NULL pointer oops when delete nic

On 11/14/19 11:22 PM, wangxiaogang (F) wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vrf.c b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> index b8228f5..86c4b8c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vrf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vrf.c
> @@ -1427,6 +1427,9 @@ static int vrf_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
>  			goto out;
> 
>  		vrf_dev = netdev_master_upper_dev_get(dev);
> +		if (!vrf_dev)
> +			goto out;
> +
>  		vrf_del_slave(vrf_dev, dev);
>  	}
>  out:

BTW, I believe this is the wrong fix. A device can not be a VRF slave
AND not have an upper device. Something is fundamentally wrong.