[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191116160635.GB5653@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2019 17:06:35 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: phy: marvell10g: add SFP+ support
> +static int mv3310_sfp_insert(void *upstream, const struct sfp_eeprom_id *id)
> +{
> + struct phy_device *phydev = upstream;
> + __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(support) = { 0, };
> + phy_interface_t iface;
> +
> + sfp_parse_support(phydev->sfp_bus, id, support);
> + iface = sfp_select_interface(phydev->sfp_bus, id, support);
> +
> + if (iface != PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_10GKR) {
> + dev_err(&phydev->mdio.dev, "incompatible SFP module inserted\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
Hi Russell
Is it possible to put an SFP module into an SFP+ cage?
sfp_select_interface() would then say 1000Base-X or 2500Base-X. The
SFP+ cage has a single SERDES pair, so electrically, would it be
possible to do 1000Base-X? Should mv3310_sfp_insert() be reconfiguring
the PHY so the SFP side swaps to 1000Base-X?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists