[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191118074934.GB130507@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 08:49:34 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jgg@...pe.ca,
parav@...lanox.com, Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 1/1] virtual-bus: Implementation of Virtual Bus
On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 02:33:55PM -0800, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> From: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
>
> This is the initial implementation of the Virtual Bus,
> virtbus_device and virtbus_driver. The virtual bus is
> a software based bus intended to support lightweight
> devices and drivers and provide matching between them
> and probing of the registered drivers.
>
> The primary purpose of the virual bus is to provide
> matching services and to pass the data pointer
> contained in the virtbus_device to the virtbus_driver
> during its probe call. This will allow two separate
> kernel objects to match up and start communication.
>
> The bus will support probe/remove shutdown and
> suspend/resume callbacks.
>
> Kconfig and Makefile alterations are included
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> ---
> v2: Cleaned up the virtual bus interface based on feedback from Greg KH
> and provided a test driver and test virtual bus device as an example
> of how to implement the virtual bus.
There is not a real user of this here, many of your exported functions
are not used at all, right? I want to see this in "real use" to
actually determine how it works, and that's the only way you will know
if it solves your problem or not.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists