lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hpKN+7ifvFUt6KMYARf19i=Jfw_dwciuPxPC6ZyHRF2XQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 19 Nov 2019 14:42:24 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Joergen Andreasen <joergen.andreasen@...rochip.com>,
        "Allan W. Nielsen" <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandru Marginean <alexandru.marginean@....com>,
        Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
        "Y.b. Lu" <yangbo.lu@....com>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Convert Ocelot and Felix switches to PHYLINK

On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 01:13, Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com> wrote:
>
> The 11/18/2019 20:10, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > This series is needed on NXP LS1028A to support the CPU port which runs
> > at 2500Mbps fixed-link, a setting which PHYLIB can't hold in its swphy
> > design.
> >
> > In DSA, PHYLINK comes "for free". I added the PHYLINK ops to the Ocelot
> > driver, integrated them to the VSC7514 ocelot_board module, then tested
> > them via the Felix front-end. The VSC7514 integration is only
> > compile-tested.
> >
> > Vladimir Oltean (2):
> >   net: mscc: ocelot: treat SPEED_UNKNOWN as SPEED_10
> >   net: mscc: ocelot: convert to PHYLINK
> >
> >  drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix.c           |  65 +++++++---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/Kconfig        |   2 +-
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c       | 153 ++++++++++++-----------
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.h       |  13 +-
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot_board.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++---
> >  include/soc/mscc/ocelot.h                |  21 +++-
> >  6 files changed, 285 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> >
> > Horatiu, I am sorry for abusing your goodwill. Could you please test
> > this series and confirm it causes no regression on VSC7514?
>
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Sorry for late reply, I have tried your patches but unfortunetly I get
> a segmentation fault when I try to set the link up.
> Here is the stack trace:
>
> # ip link set dev eth0 up
> [  259.978564] CPU 0 Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000008, epc == 805aa7a4, ra == 805aa79c
> [  259.989679] Oops[#1]:
> [  259.992007] CPU: 0 PID: 98 Comm: ip Not tainted
> 5.4.0-rc7-01844-g0d53d4ce24f5 #2
> [  259.999428] $ 0   : 00000000 00000001 80910000 fffffff8
> [  260.004687] $ 4   : 8090838c 0000000e 9e51589c 9e515cbc
> [  260.009940] $ 8   : 00000000 807bea44 00000000 00000000
> [  260.015193] $12   : 00000000 00000020 00402f1c 00000002
> [  260.020445] $16   : 00000000 808e0000 808074f4 9f8a4828
> [  260.025699] $20   : 00000000 9e515cbc 9e515ba0 9e54fc10
> [  260.030952] $24   : 00000000 9e515dac
> [  260.036206] $28   : 9e514000 9e515840 00000000 805aa79c
> [  260.041460] Hi    : 00000129
> [  260.044351] Lo    : 00001a94
> [  260.047311] epc   : 805aa7a4 phylink_start+0x20/0x2e0
> [  260.052387] ra    : 805aa79c phylink_start+0x18/0x2e0
> [  260.057454] Status: 11008403 KERNEL EXL IE
> [  260.061661] Cause : 00800008 (ExcCode 02)
> [  260.065683] BadVA : 00000008
> [  260.068575] PrId  : 02019654 (MIPS 24KEc)
> [  260.072596] Modules linked in:
> [  260.075673] Process ip (pid: 98, threadinfo=(ptrval), task=(ptrval), tls=77e564a0)
> [  260.083263] Stack : 00000000 00000000 9f8a4800 808e0000 808074f4 9e515cbc 00000000 9f8a4800
> [  260.091662]         808e0000 805b7898 00000000 00000000 00000000 808e0000 808074f4 8062cf20
> [  260.100058]         00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 9f8a4800
> [  260.108453]         9e515cbc 0295ff75 00000000 9f8a4800 00001003 808e0000 00000000 8062d39c
> [  260.116850]         00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
> [  260.125245]         ...
> [  260.127706] Call Trace:
> [  260.130176] [<805aa7a4>] phylink_start+0x20/0x2e0
> [  260.134955] [<805b7898>] ocelot_port_open+0x10/0x20
> [  260.139897] [<8062cf20>] __dev_open+0x10c/0x194
> [  260.144457] [<8062d39c>] __dev_change_flags+0x1b0/0x210
> [  260.149712] [<8062d420>] dev_change_flags+0x24/0x68
> [  260.154625] [<806482d4>] do_setlink+0x340/0xaec
> [  260.159182] [<8064978c>] __rtnl_newlink+0x484/0x7d8
> [  260.164086] [<80649b30>] rtnl_newlink+0x50/0x84
> [  260.168676] [<80643484>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x2e8/0x3b8
> [  260.173859] [<8067c9c0>] netlink_rcv_skb+0xa0/0x150
> [  260.178766] [<8067abdc>] netlink_unicast+0x1c4/0x26c
> [  260.183760] [<8067b478>] netlink_sendmsg+0x2cc/0x3e0
> [  260.188758] [<80601df8>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xec/0x280
> [  260.193584] [<80603b9c>] __sys_sendmsg+0x60/0xac
> [  260.198246] [<80115e98>] syscall_common+0x34/0x58
> [  260.202979] Code: afb10020  10400055  3c028091 <8e020008> 8c420004 10400086  24030001  1043006d  00000000
> [  260.212788]
> [  260.214696] ---[ end trace 42880f8a413b404b ]---
> Segmentation fault
> #
>
> The reason of this segmentation is that, before it was fine to use the
> phy PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA. Now if the phy interface is
> PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA it would not create the phylink. I think this can
> be fixed in the device tree.
>

Oops, that does not sound good. But what crashes in phylink_start,
exactly, and why? I see there is a print right at the beginning of the
function, and it isn't visible in your log. Does it crash at the
print?

> Apparently there is another issue: mscc mdio bus driver fails to be
> probed. So first I need to see this issue and then I will try your
> patches.
>
> >
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> --
> /Horatiu

Thanks,
-Vladimir

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ