[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20191119163147-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2019 16:33:40 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Parav Pandit <parav@...lanox.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Dave Ertman <david.m.ertman@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
Kiran Patil <kiran.patil@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Bie, Tiwei" <tiwei.bie@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next v2 1/1] virtual-bus: Implementation of Virtual Bus
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 03:15:47PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 01:58:42PM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:46:32PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > As always, this is all very hard to tell without actually seeing real
> > > accelerated drivers implement this.
> > >
> > > Your patch series might be a bit premature in this regard.
> >
> > Actually drivers implementing this have been posted, haven't they?
> > See e.g. https://lwn.net/Articles/804379/
>
> Is that a real driver? It looks like another example quality
> thing.
>
> For instance why do we need any of this if it has '#define
> IFCVF_MDEV_LIMIT 1' ?
>
> Surely for this HW just use vfio over the entire PCI function and be
> done with it?
>
> Jason
What this does is allow using it with unmodified virtio drivers within guests.
You won't get this with passthrough as it only implements parts of
virtio in hardware.
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists